In a serial of recent posts (most recent here ), I’ve been sharply critical of filings past times the Solicitor General inward the Hargan v. Garza abortion litigation, involving HHS’s efforts to deny minors inward their de facto custody the powerfulness to exercise their constitutional rights. Last month, for example, I wrote that the Solicitor General’s nominal “Petition for Certiorari” in No. 17-654 “[i]n many respects . . . departs, sometimes dramatically, from the justly lauded, traditional standards as well as practices of [the Office of the Solicitor General].” Unfortunately, it appears that the Hargan litigation is non a singular aberration. Three weeks later on his petition inward Hargan , the Solicitor General filed another extraordinary brief inward No. 17-130, Lucia v. SEC , well-nigh a topic far removed from (and less heated than) abortion rights—namely, whether the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) who piece of work inward the Securities as well as Exchange C
The discussion “emolument” occurs 16 times inwards William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England . Here is a listing of chapters inwards which the term appears: Book I (Of the Rights of Persons) 1. Introduction (“Of the Study, Nature, as well as Extent of the Laws of England”) a. Section IV (“Of the Countries Subject to the Laws of England”) 2. Chapter VII (“Of the King’s Prerogative”) 3. Chapter VIII (“Of the King’s Revenue”) 4. Chapter XI (“Of the Clergy”) 5. Chapter XVIII (“Of Corporations”) Book II (Of the Rights of Things) 6. Chapter III, #1 (“Of Incorporeal Hereditaments”) 7. Chapter III, #2 (“Of Incorporeal Hereditaments”) 8. Chapter V (“Of the Ancient English linguistic communication Tenures”) 9. Chapter XVIII (“Of Title yesteryear Forfeiture”) 10. Chapter XXI (“Of Alienation yesteryear Matter of Record”) 11. Chapter XXXI (“Of Title yesteryear Bankruptcy”) 12
In Apr 2018, the Georgetown Center for the Constitution awarded its source Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize of $50,000 to Professors Gary Lawson in addition to Guy Seidman for their book, ‘A Great Power of Attorney’: Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution (Kansas University Press, 2017). To celebrate the mass in addition to its authors, the Center held a symposium at Georgetown that featured critical responses to A Great Power of Attorney yesteryear Ethan Leib in addition to Jed Shugerman, Richard Primus, Suzanna Sherry, in addition to myself. The collected papers, together amongst a answer from Lawson in addition to Seidman, volition hold upward published inwards The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy . My contribution to the symposium is straightaway posted to SSRN . It consists of a detailed refutation of the primary originalist thesis of A Great Power of Attorney , along amongst the conditional defence of a competing claim Lawson in addition to Seidman reject: tha
Comments
Post a Comment