fooc

[ UPDATE equally of early on Tuesday morning, 12/19 :  The developments are coming fast as well as furious as well as are a flake confusing--bear alongside me here.  ( If y'all haven't yet done so, y'all should likely read the principal post, below, for context.) : 1. On Mon evening, Judge Chutkan issued the TRO, which applies to both girls.  It requires the accused ORR officials to " allow J.R. as well as J.P. to move transported--promptly  and without delay, . . . to an abortion provider, inwards social club to obtain any  pregnancy or abortion-related medical tending as well as to obtain the abortion physical care for itself, in  accordance alongside the abortion providers’ availability as well as whatsoever medical requirements," as well as restrains those defendants " from interfering alongside or obstructing J.R.’s as well as J.P.’s access to  abortion counseling or an abortion."  Judge Chutkan stayed the social club for 24 hours--until 6:05 p.m

At oral argument ii weeks agone inward Masterpiece Cakeshop , the Justices did non look to move taken with whatever of the unconvincing distinctions that the bakery’s counsel together with the U.S.A. of America Solicitor General were offering with honor to which refusals of service would, together with which would not, move constitutionally protected nether their compelled spoken language rationales, such as: -- betwixt pre-made together with made-to-order custom cakes; -- betwixt jewelers on the ane paw and, for some reason, make-up artists together with pilus stylists on the other; -- betwixt cake-makers together with architects [1] ; -- betwixt a chef designing a beautiful presentation for a couple’s anniversary celebration together with the baker’s piece of work inward this instance on a cake for a political party to celebrate a wedding; and -- betwixt discrimination against same-sex couples or interreligious couples (constitutionally protected, according to t

Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court inwards Clinton v. Jones ruled unanimously that a sitting President may live on sued for send occurring earlier he became President.   Jones was a conform inwards federal court, thence the determination inwards that example does non resolve the enquiry of whether a sitting President may live on sued inwards a solid position down courtroom inwards otherwise parallel circumstances.   Right now, at that topographic point is a pending conform inwards solid position down courtroom inwards New York raising that side yesteryear side question. The suit, Zervos v. Trump , involves a defamation claim brought yesteryear a one-time contestant on the television receiver demo The Apprentice .   In 2016, when Donald Trump was campaigning for the Presidency, now-plaintiff Summer Zervos was i of several women who accused Trump of having sexually harassed them inwards the past.   Trump responded inwards public, maxim about things nearly Zervos that Zervos all